Tenders, transactions, and advisory pursuits across energy, infrastructure, defence, technology, mining, government, and media — in India and a dozen countries beyond.
Anonymised to protect client confidentiality — the situations, and the numbers, are real. References available under NDA.
A government-sector team was finding tenders by manually scanning portals, then burning analyst-weeks qualifying each one. Pursuits were regularly discovered too late to bid well — or at all.
MAZi Procura ran the portfolio — automated discovery across portals and PSU pipelines, every tender extracted to a source-cited data sheet, clause-level risk flags, and first-cut response drafts.
Tenders surfaced 5–15 days earlier, qualification effort down 80–90%, and the bid/no-bid call made same or next day — senior hours moved from assembly to differentiation.
An acquisition of a deep-tech target with technology, IP, and market questions the deal team couldn't cover in-house — and advisory-led diligence quoted in weeks the exclusivity window didn't have.
VERDICT ingested the data room and ran technology, IP, market, and financial workstreams in parallel — with a mandatory devil's-advocate pass building the bear case, and expert sign-off at every gate.
A source-cited decision pack in days — findings, risk register, and the bear case in one file — so the committee interrogated evidence instead of waiting for it.
A port concession with thousands of pages of tender and agreement documents — and the risks that decide these deals (termination, traffic assumptions, counterparty terms) buried deep inside them.
The full document universe assessed clause by clause — concession terms, traffic and revenue assumptions, and counterparty risk mapped, with pre-bid queries drafted where the documents left gaps.
A risk register the pursuit team could defend line by line — every flag traceable to document, page, and clause — and anomalies caught before bid commitment, not after.
Clause-level tender assessment and pursuit intelligence for the sector where the documents run longest.
A portfolio of power, transmission, and renewables tenders assessed end to end — clause-level risk registers, pre-bid query packs drafted from information gaps, and win probability modelled before major pursuit spend.
Pursuit support on an engagement for a global energy major — scope assessment, competitive positioning, and a source-cited data sheet assembled from the full document universe ahead of the response.
Public-sector pursuits supported for Big4 Consulting and other advisory pipelines — where compliance detail decides the outcome.
Tenders under the Gati Shakti national master plan and a wider portfolio of government pursuits assessed for a Big4 consulting— automated discovery, eligibility screening, clause-level risk flags, and first-cut response drafts.
State-government programme pursuit assessed against eligibility, scoring criteria, and delivery risk — with pre-bid queries drafted where the tender documents left information gaps.
Port-sector pursuit assessed across concession terms, traffic and revenue assumptions, and counterparty risk — every flag cited back to document, page, and clause.
Municipal solid-waste tender assessed end to end — scope and service-level obligations mapped, payment mechanism stress-tested, and compliance requirements screened before bid commitment.
Diligence and commercial pursuits run through the MAZi Capital workstreams.
Acquisition diligence on a deep-tech target — technology, IP, market, and financial workstreams run in parallel to a grounded, source-cited decision pack with the bear case built in.
Commercial pursuit in the digital-media space — requirements decomposed, evaluation criteria mapped to response strengths, and the bid/no-bid call supported with modelled win probability.
Pursuits where security, sovereignty, and auditability are the evaluation criteria — the settings our partners built their careers in.
Defence-sector tenders assessed under restricted procurement frameworks — eligibility and clearance requirements, offset obligations, and indigenisation criteria screened before commitment, with a full evidence trail.
Analytical-platform and intelligence-programme pursuits assessed for capability fit, accountability requirements, and delivery risk — designed for settings where every output must be auditable.
Semiconductor-ecosystem pursuits assessed techno-commercially — incentive-scheme eligibility, capex and supply-chain assumptions, and partner positioning stress-tested against the evaluation criteria.
Data-centre development pursuits assessed across site, power availability, connectivity, and anchor-tenancy economics — with concession and offtake terms flagged clause by clause.
Sovereign AI programme pursuits assessed end to end — national compute capacity, data-residency and governance requirements, and operating-model economics mapped against the programme's evaluation framework.
Resource opportunities assessed from licence to offtake — geology, jurisdiction, and economics in one evidence trail.
Wolfram (tungsten) opportunity assessed across resource quality, licensing status, extraction economics, and offtake demand from strategic industries.
Gold and copper mining assets in Peru assessed for acquisition — reserve estimates, concession terms, community and regulatory risk, and development economics run in parallel workstreams.
Rare and strategic metals opportunities screened across jurisdictions — supply-demand outlook, processing routes, and jurisdiction risk mapped to a comparative investment view.
The same discipline applied across jurisdictions — local procurement rules encoded, every finding traceable to source.
Multiple pursuits across Malaysia assessed under local procurement frameworks — eligibility, local-content requirements, and delivery risk screened before commitment.
Port-sector engagement at Ashdod assessed across concession structure, operations and throughput assumptions, and geopolitical and counterparty risk — every flag cited to source.
Pursuit assessment in Ghana — tender documents decomposed against local regulatory requirements, counterparty and payment risk flagged, and the response scoped to the evaluation criteria.
European pursuit assessed under EU procurement rules — qualification thresholds, scoring weights, and compliance obligations mapped to a clear go/no-go recommendation.
Nordic engagements assessed across both markets — procurement frameworks, sustainability and reporting obligations, and competitive positioning screened ahead of the responses.
Engagement summaries are indicative and anonymised where required — client-confidential figures and references are shared under NDA.